The answer to your question has to be B
His warnings were the political parties would divide people. They were not heeded because many people had different ideas, values and disagreements. Many different political parties have been registered over the years but the only two which evolved and survived are the two we have today.
There is no right or wrong, which distinguishes Christian ethics from strictly scientific ethics for a number of reasons.
<h3>What distinctions exist between Christian and scientific ethics?</h3>
The sciences have been and continue to be supported by Christianity. Many clergy have been involved in the sciences, and it has been widely used in the construction of schools, universities, and hospitals. Christian ethics is not a theory, model, framework, or intellectual creation of either humans or the divine. Christian ethics are fundamentally distinct from those of all other world religions. Each ethical philosophy offers concepts (propositions) regarding what is right and wrong. These concepts are either human conceptions or they are said to be divine. Scientific and religious explanations can in reality conflict when religious explanations explicitly make use of or presuppose empirical truths and when these claims are known to be true. Religion deals with the spiritual and supernatural, whereas science studies the natural world; as a result, the two can complement one another. There need not be a tension between religious belief and the scientific view of evolution, according to statements made by several religious organizations.
To know more about Christian ethics and scientific ethics, click here:
brainly.com/question/21842202
#SPJ4
Answer:
In the framework of modern psychology, abnormal behavior, or a disorder in other words, occurs as a result of <u>different types of causes</u>:
- <em>Necessary cause</em> refers to the cause that is <em>necessary for the development of abnormal behavior</em>. <em>Without the presence of such cause, it would not develop</em>. Meanwhile, the cause may occur but outcome is not going to develop from it. Let us take the example of occupational burnout syndrome. It can occur only if the cause of continuous work-related stress is present. Meanwhile, not every individual exposed to continuous work-related stress will develop this syndrome.
- If <em>sufficient cause</em> is present, individual will <em>always develop abnormal behavior</em>. It is a bulletproof cause that has only one outcome. For example, severe accumulated sleep deprivation will always lead to fatigue, drowsiness and impaired cognition. All truck drivers who are constantly sleep deprived ultimately experience these conditions, which can lead to serious motor vehicle injuries.
- <em>Contributory cause</em> in its turn <em>contributes to the development of abnormal behavior</em>. It does not cause it directly, nor serves as necessary basis for its development. For example, cannabis consumption have been linked to the greater chance of developing schizophrenia among those individual who already belong to the risk group (people with respective heredity).
Answer: Individuals have some basic rights that are obvious and should not be taken away.
Explanation:We hold these truths to be self- evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
