Answer:
antony was demanded the people to listen hear him. He tried to win the people over and support through logical explanations. He listed down the reasons for killing Caesar and was very concise in his speech as he believed the truth will convince the people and rally to his cause. The problem was the people didn’t connect with his arguments and he was too aloof in his approach that he failed to gain their support and he should make a speech wherein he had a personal connection with the crowd. Anthony on the other hand asked the people to hear him. His agreement of the senate’s actions was for the subtle purpose of discrediting all that they said. Listing down the achievements of Caesar, he was all manipulating the crowd by appealing to their emotion. As he made his speech, he was crying and this moved the crowd enabling him to win them over. Anthony was the better orator because of his use of emotion and facts
Answer:
I think D.
Explanation:
He seems to be trying to encourage whoever to start relying on yourself to succeed in whatever the task he is trying to succeed in.
Hope this helps!!
You may be hearing a biased or hindered perception of the story.
I think this partially answers your question??
Answer:
In this sentence the word is would be your predicate.
Explanation:
Your predicate within a sentence, is also another word for your verb. The verb in the sentence above is a linking verb.
