The ancient Egyptians were of the view that the body dies and the soul never dies. After the body is buried underground, the soul returns to the body. The ancient Egyptians thought that if the body was not preserved, then the soul would find it difficult to recognize the body. This theory actually made them go for mummification. Once the body was mummified, then the body would remain intact and the soul would easily find and get back to the body for its afterlife journey.
From the excerpt that we have here, the way that the ghost affected Brutus was that: Brutus accepts the ghost's challenge to meet with him again.
<h3>What is the summary of this excerpt?</h3>
From this excerpt, after Caesar had been betrayed, his ghost visited Brutus because he wanted to see him in Phillipi.
Althouh Brutus was afraid, he still tried to act brave by making the promise to meet with the ghost at that venue.
Raed more onbrainly.com/question/1324420
#SPJ1
here:
Answer:
15 years in prision & you will end up with 30,000 $ in fines.
Explanation:
Answer: The statement implies adapting the Constitution to all sections of society.
Explanation:
The American Constitution, in its concept, is often viewed as the first modern democratic document. It is based on the rule of law and liberties. The Constitution is the cornerstone of the American democratic society. The Constitution covers all sections of American society. It seeks not to discriminate against anyone on the basis of racial, religious or ethnic origin, given that American society is a conglomerate of nations and nationalities. As such, the Constitution has a broad social framework. In its conception, it is a changing category, so as such it has been evoking and adapting throughout the current social and political currents throughout history. This is why the Constitution has historically been widely used.
It was most likely that the anti-federalists would choose a robust state government and a meager federal one.
What principles do antifederalists adhere to?
What are antifederalists?
Many Anti-Federalists supported a constrained central government because they equated British persecution with strong governments. Others wanted to further democracy but were concerned that a strong government would be in the hands of the wealthy. They felt that the states were giving the new federal government an overwhelming amount of power.
What were the Anti-Federalists' arguments?
The national power grab was opposed by the Anti-Federalists. They supported localized, constrained national authority, similar to that provided by the Articles of Confederation.
For additional information on The Anti-Federalists, visit brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ4