Answer:A. Net proceed $13,700,000
($20*700,000)-$300,000
B. Earnings per share $2.17
$6500,000/3,000,000 shared
C. Earnings per share $1.76
$6,500,000/3,700,000 shares
Answer: $428,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Accounts payable = $62,000
Accounts receivable = 100,000
Cash = 30,000
Inventory = 138,000
Land = 160,000
Common Stock = 200,000
Revenue = 80,000
Dividends = 56,000
Expenses = 40,000
Total assets = Accounts receivable + Cash + Inventory + Land
= 100,000 + 30,000 + 138,000 + 160,000
= $428,000
Answer:
First option is the right choice.
Explanation:
He will not have as much money for college classes, because he will have to pay for the trailer and its maintenance.
Visit: gotit-pro.com for fastest, top-notch and impeccable homework and exams help in a range of subjects and ace your academics.
Thanks and Best Regards: Your Friendly Study Co-Pilot
Answer:
useful life= 12 years
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchase price= $140,000
Salvage value= $20,000
Annual depreciation= $10,000
<u>To calculate the useful life, we need to use the straight-line method formula:</u>
Annual depreciation= (original cost - salvage value)/estimated life (years)
10,000= (140,00 - 20,000) / useful life
10,000useful life = 120,000
useful life= 120,000 / 10,000
useful life= 12 years
Answer:
Consider the following explanations
Explanation:
a. The whole argument is based on the controlling of different factors such as age, education and occupation among males and females. Now, this is very subjective how they have controlled occupation. For e.g. – Which all occupation they have considered for as stressful job, which all jobs they have considered as physical tiring jobs. Working in a refinery may be physical tiring job but then working in IT Company can also be tiring.
Therefore since there are lot of factors at play apart the one considered to calculate ratio’s we can say that these differential percentage points can always be more than or less than of what presented in question.
b. The same logic has to be applied to (b) as well. When we say that discrimination account for less than 8 percent of differential we implied to say that occupation nature may have more than 12 percent of differential. Now, if you use above logic and applied from occupation point of view.