1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
5

"In the case of ____________________, the Supreme Court held that a defendant's decision not to testify during the trial cannot

be held against him or her.​
Social Studies
1 answer:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The possible answers for this question are:

a. Adamson v. California

b. Batson v. Kentucky

c. J.E.B. v. Alabama

d. Swain v. Alabama

The correct answer is:

a. Adamson v. California

Explanation:

For the Supreme Court, according to the fifth Amendment, in this case Adamson, who had been convicted by the state of California for being guilty of first degree murder, had the right to omit his testimony against himself.

Basically, the fifth amendment of the constitution of the United States of America states that an individual would be protected against self-incrimination.

You might be interested in
The social-conflict approach explains why all the world's societies recognize some form of incest taboo
katrin2010 [14]
The statement that is mentioned above is true. It is because the incest taboo is not a practice that a person should do because this is inappropriate and could cause humorous conflicts. The social conflict approach explains this matter because it focuses on the human's way of thinking and how they deal with social problems.
6 0
3 years ago
The legal means to secure the presence of a nonparty witness for deposition is known as a notice of intent to take oral depositi
Lubov Fominskaja [6]
The correct answer for this question is "TRUE." The legal means to secure the presence of a nonparty witness for deposition is known as a notice of intent to take oral deposition. This statement is true as far as the legal means in securing the presence of a nonparty witness is concerned.
6 0
3 years ago
Why is national authority important to Canadas hisory​
marin [14]

Answer: Because Canada is constitutional monarchy

Explanation:

Since Canada is a constitutional monarchy, every act of the government in Canada is considering consulting in the name of the Crown but for those situations and acts the peoples' authority is the one who is obligated and taking into consideration. Canada's executive authority is assigned by the Constitution.

4 0
3 years ago
Inca civilization was structured as ​
Tpy6a [65]

as an empire on top of mountains so no intruders could get in.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is Mrs. Frisby able to identify the radio in Nicodemus's office?
viktelen [127]
She has one in her house
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do the chinese people, the kingdom of ghana and caravans have in common
    12·1 answer
  • Why is the caste system a central part of the Hindu religion
    12·2 answers
  • Everyone choose terai region for settlement .why?
    15·1 answer
  • Describing college students in north america today it is true that
    13·1 answer
  • What influence did early Muslim traders have in Europe and North Africa
    13·2 answers
  • Which country in South America lies farthest North?
    5·2 answers
  • A boy thinks about stealing a candy bar from the store because he is hungry. He is prevented from doing so because of the possib
    5·1 answer
  • 17
    8·1 answer
  • When did Lincoln begin his plan for reuniting the union
    12·1 answer
  • George Washington wanted to ratify the Constitution. What does ratify mean?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!