not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
No, because the two populations from which the samples are selected do not appear to have equal variances.
<h3><u>What is an fMRI?</u></h3>
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a sort of noninvasive brain imaging technique, was created in the early 1990s and uses changes in blood flow to identify brain activity.
An fMRI can show which area of the brain is engaged when you lift your arm or even merely think about something. This knowledge can be used by medical professionals and researchers to recognize, monitor, and treat a variety of illnesses.
<u>What is an fMRI used for?</u>
fMRIs are often employed in both clinical and academic settings. With the use of this technology, we can comprehend the function of the brain both in a healthy state and one that is ill.
Uses for an fMRI include:
- plan for surgery or other therapies by identifying conditions
- look for anomalies
- determining which brain areas control vital activities.
- analyze how ailments and injuries including cancer, concussions, and epilepsy affect cognitive function.
- the effectiveness of a medicine.
Learn more about fMRIs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/12078873
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can answer the following.
If I’m doing research on communication apprehension and I define high apprehension as someone who has at least 8 "ums," "uhs," or "ers" in a five minute period, I have created a(n): operational definition.
After doing part of your research, you will be able to get some definitions straight, created by yourself. In this case, you can come up with an operational definition. which means that you collect the proper data and define it in a clear, concise way. So your operational definition can express with clarity one of the objects of the study.
Ethical objectivism is based on the idea that morality has an existence outside the human mind.
The view that the claims of ethics are objectively actual; they're not 'relative' to a subject or a tradition, nor simply subjective of their nature, in competition to blunders theories, skepticism, and relativism.
ethical objectivists agree with that morality treats all of us equally no person has different obligations or is subject to distinctive expectations simply due to who he is. If one man or woman in a specific scenario has a obligation then all of us else in a similar role has the same duty.
Objectivism holds that the reason of morality is to outline a code of values in support of 1's very own life, a human lifestyles. The values of Objectivism are the manner to a happy life. They consist of such things as wealth, love, pleasure in paintings, training, creative notion, and lots greater.
Learn more about Ethical objectivism here: brainly.com/question/8590887
#SPJ4
Answer:
They worked to free the serfs
Explanation: They worked to free medieval laborers (aka) slaves
Hope this helps <3
