I think the answer is A. but i am not sure
Ask yourself, instead, the opposite:
With the creation of the atomic bomb (there being 2 already, and 1 on the way), would it be necessary to risk millions of troops, billions of dollars worth of equipments, and trillion dollars in costs, to attack each island one by one, in hope of defeating Japan? The U.S. at Okinawa already knew how the Japanese would fight, with tooth & nails, and how surrender is not an option. With the ultimation of 2 atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima & Nagasaki respectifully, and the 3rd one being prepped, it not only gave the devastating feel, but also time for the Japanese government to ponder whether or not they should continue a war that they will lose anyways. In war, to save a life, 100% of the time a death must occur. It was necessary to bring destruction to Japan to save the lives of millions of Allied troops, and that in doing so, the A-bombs were used.
Answer:The answer is the first one."Stepped up the Deployment etc."
Explanation:The treaty limited each side to only one ABM deployment area (i.e., missile-launching site) and 100 interceptor missiles. These limitations prevented either party from defending more than a small fraction of its entire territory, and thus kept both sides subject to the deterrent effect of the other's strategic forces.
i hope this answer helps you.And i get that brainliest ;-;
Answer:
Article IV, Section 2 guarantees that states cannot discriminate against citizens of other states. Article IV, Section 2 also establishes rules for when an alleged criminal flees to another state. It provides that the second state is obligated to return the fugitive to the state where the crime was committed.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!! XDDDDD
