Answer:
(1) It is governed by a single, local ruler
(2) It i made up of several-city states or countries
Explanation:
I'm not sure if i'm right, so don't rely on this.
Both were a series of articles written under fake names to protect the writers. The viewpoint of the group, such as the federalists, who wanted a strong national government, and the antifederalists who were afraid of an imbalance of power, were presented and argued back and forth. People reading these publications had access to information that they would not have had otherwise, and therefore were influenced by the opinions of these two groups.
First Answer:
The socialism never found support among the people in United States due to small power of the workers Union. Also, companies have more political and financial power over their demands.
Second answer:
There could be more support for the homeless and poor people in big cities. Health care and some childhood protection against poverty might be another benefits from it.
Third answer:
The negative aspects we could imagine as the political power of unions increased among the workers. They would start attempting a coup across the country in order to start a social-communist regime. Another problem could be the increase in corruption, based on the good faith of the poor, that is, they could "buy votes" among the poor by threatening them with benefits' cut if the worker does not support them or does not vote for them.
Answer:
technological innovation system
Explanation:
Even though technological innovation system might create large amount of capital during earlier stage, it can drastically cut down operational cost in the long run.
India and China Cambodia is a developing country and Japan will not be allowed to be a superpower due to the world closely monitoring them after WWII
