From Charlotte's complaint we can conclude that First American was most likely an organic organization.
An organic organization can be described as an organization that has all of its employees working at the same level.
It is flexible, has little layers of management and also has the ability to adapt well to changes. Also the organization is one that has little supervision.
This is obvious because of the claim that employees were not used to so much oversight.
Read more on brainly.com/question/15394268?referrer=searchResults
Thanks for the question!
Positive; You can prove that you can present yourself in a way thst id honorable.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
A strong exchange rate
Explanation:
strong exchange rate is often considered to be a sign of economic strength. It can become a symbol of national pride. Often politicians are worried if they see a ‘weakening’ in the exchange rate. They will point to a strong exchange rate as a symbol of economic success. In the long-term, a strong (appreciating) exchange rate tends to occur in countries with low inflation, improving competitiveness and a strong economic performance. For example, Japan and Germany saw a sustained rise in their exchange rates in the post-war period because they had a good economic performance. Often a devaluation (fall in the value of the exchange rate) can cause a boost to economic growth. A lower exchange rate makes exports cheaper and increases demand for UK goods. This can provide additional demand which increases economic growth. A devaluation may cause inflation:
But, if demand for exports and imports is relatively elastic and there is some spare capacity in the economy, then there should be an increase in economic growth. Exchange rates are determined by factors, such as interest rates, confidence, the current account on balance of payments, economic growth and relative inflation rates. In general terms, a weaker currency will stimulate exports and make imports more expensive, thereby decreasing a nation’s trade deficit (or increasing surplus) over time.
Answer:
$132,000
Explanation:
Particulars Amount
Service cost $82,000
Add: Interest on projected benefit obligation $56,000
Add: Amortization of prior service cost $12,000
due to increase in benefits
Less: Expected return on plan assets <u>($18,000)</u>
Pension expense <u>$132,000</u>
Answer:
$43,510.2
Explanation:
The problem says that the pension is calculated by multiplying the number of years worked (27) times 1.65% of the average of the three highest years salary. First, we calculate the average of Maureen´s highest salaries:
$97,000+$97,800+$98,198 = $292,998/3 = $97,666
Then we calculate the 1,65% of $97,666:
$97,666*0,0165=$1,611.48
Finally, we multiply this answer by the number of years Maureen worked:
$1,611.48*27= $43,510.203 This is Maureen´s pension