Answer for the second
'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.
The focus of the Berlin Conference of 1847 is the <u>African Continent</u> which is the <u>red continent</u>
Hope that helps!
Muhammed Avdol from Jojo's Bizarre Adventures
Answer:
A, who (world health organization)
Explanation:
The statement " Luther did not support the peasant revolt of 1520 because he believed peasants should obey their lords," is true.
Peasants in western and southern Germany demanded agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords during the peasant uprising in Germany.
Martin Luther condemned the revolt, thus he contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the Swabian League.