She will no longer believe that all athletes are stupid because she has been proven wrong by Patrick breaking the stereotype into pieces. She may consider rephrasing her belief into 'some athletes' or ' most athletes' instead of 'all athletes' because Patrick is an obvious exception.
Answer:
No, the court would not have been so lenient with her.
Explanation:
Whether or not Carmela was passive in the situation or she was only guiding her father on how to go about the lawsuit, the court has every right and would have included her in the lawsuit with her father. This is so because her father and she would have been included in the lawsuit in default. Hence, it is not a matter of decency or not, but a matter of what is supposed to be.
When water changes to vapor it is evaporating so your answer is A
The answer is: torts
The torts court is created specifically to address the case that cause a certain harms or liability to other citizens. The majority portion of the cases that brought to this court are not punishable by the criminal laws. Defendants more give some sort of financial settlement with the accuser before the court could deliver its decision.
Answer:
- <em>Put a price on carbon.</em>
- <em>Put a price on carbon.End fossil fuel subsidies.</em>
- <em>Put a price on carbon.End fossil fuel subsidies.Build low-carbon, resilient cities.</em>
- <em>Put a price on carbon.End fossil fuel subsidies.Build low-carbon, resilient cities.Increase energy efficiency and use of renewable energy.</em>
- <em>Put a price on carbon.End fossil fuel subsidies.Build low-carbon, resilient cities.Increase energy efficiency and use of renewable energy.Implement climate-smart agriculture and nurture forest landscapes.</em>
Explanation:
<h3>I hope this helps!</h3>
