No, it is not a function.
Since all the lines have been drawn in the grid line do not have any connection between them even a point in common.
I hope this has been useful for you.
Answer:
In mathematics, a rational number is a number such as −3/7 that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction p/q of two integers, a numerator p and a non-zero denominator q. Every integer is a rational number: for example, 5 = 5/1.
In mathematics, the irrational numbers are all the real numbers which are not rational numbers. That is, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers.
Step-by-step explanation:
hope it helps :)))
Coefficients are 2 and 3
Constant is M
768 because 6x8 = 48 the 8 drop Down to the answer and the 4 on top of 1 and multiply 1x8= 8+1 =9 so the 9 drop down to the answer. Now that is fake because you need to multiply 4x6 and 4x1 so 4x6 is 24 below the 8 add a 0 and go 1 move to the left and put 4 and 2 on top of 1 now 4x1 is 4+1 is 5 and put 5 on the left of 4 and the final step is add 98+540=768 so 768 is your real answer.
Let us examine the speed of growth of the function. We have that the difference between successive terms is: 2, 4, 8, 16. These are powers of 2 and thus there is clearly an exponential increase in the parent function. In fact, the function can be modeled by f(x)=C+2^x where C is a constant.
We have that the new function is g(x). Translating upwards by 5 means that the new y-values are 5 units higher. Hence, we have that the pairs (x,f(x)) correspond to the pairs (x,f(x)+5) and thus the answer is that the f(x)/y-values will be increased by 5.
According to the above, we need to check the given values and see whether in some cases we have g(x)=f(x)+5; in layman's terms, we need to check whether for some x, the new y-value is bigger by 5 from the old one. This is the case only for (2,16) since the old point was (2,11).
