I would think
<span>C. By the amount of people who moved to the south during reconstruction
</span>
Statistically, Less developed countries typically spend over half of their household income on food. In 2016 a survey showed that out of nine less developed countries observed, four were in Africa, four in Asia, and one in South America, below is the outcome of the survey.
<u>AFRICA</u>
Nigeria 56.4%.
Kenya 46.7%.
Cameroon 45.6%.
Algeria 42.5%.
<u>ASIA</u>
Kazakhstan 43.0%.
the Philippines 41.9%.
Pakistan 40.9%.
Azerbaijan 40.1%.
Guatemala is the only country from South American to appear on the list and families here spend about 40.6% of its income on food.
However, with the crisis in Zimbabwe, Somalia, Sudan, and other less developed countries facing Economic, financial and food crisis, it is estimated that as at January 2019, they spend almost 87% of their household income on food.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "the Enlightenment philosopher John Locke," since he was very much a proponent of popular sovereignty and the social contract. </span></span>
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 are all the answer unicorn because I just know. I’m jusT THAT smart
Knowing absolutely nothing about any of these events- obviously, "C". Is the only event necessarily capable of unifying a country.
<span>Nothing can possibly unite a country like overthrowing and kicking out foreign rulers! </span>
<span>A- No appointed ruler can satisfy all factions. </span>
<span>B- As above, so below. </span>
<span>D- Beside the fact that one guy arming himself is not going to make everybody happy, that he had to do it secretly implies that he must not have had all the country behind him. </span>
