This sentence is incorrect because it is a run-on sentence. This means that it should be broken into two separate sentences:
Ladybugs are also called lady beetles. In Europe, they are called ladybird beetles.
It's easy to catch this mistake by either reading the sentence out loud and listening for a natural pause, or by looking for one subject and one verb per sentence (Ladybugs are; they are).
<span> the irony is that they wanted 2,000 dollars for the return of the sonand then they paid the sons father 250 dollars to get rid of the boy so in the end they ended up being the ones to pay and not the sons father.</span>
Hiking along the trail, the Grand Canyon came into view.
I could see that I had a flat tire walking toward the car
Maybe...
The ocean because the natural element that narrator think mrs.ebbling is symbolically connected to the ocean
Hey there Carlos!
Let's examine this above.
<span>Jeremy will be planting tulips in the spring.
let's take some key point's from this.
</span><span>Jeremy (will) be (planting) tulips in the spring.
The word's "will" and also "planting" are a form of the future tense.
So, in this case, we can cross out both option (c) and also (d).
Option (c) and also (d) are (present), and the sentence is not present, it would be in the future.
So, now we have both option (a) and also (b) as our last options.
This would be considered a "future perfect progressive" because the sentence shows that "he will plant tulips", which shows that this would be a future perfect goal pretty much.
Hope this helps you Carlos, and if you need any more help, never hesitate to ask more question's on Brainly
~Jurgen</span>
