Why would the Proclamation of 1763 anger the British colonies?

History

2 answers:

Alika [10]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The Proclamation of 1763 prevented the colonists from traveling where they wanted.

Explanation:

The Proclamation of 1763 was issued by King George III on October 7, 1763. It forbade all settlements expanding west of a line drawn along the Appalachian Mountains which was Native American territory. :)

MaRussiya [10]2 years ago

5 0

The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was very unpopular with the colonists. ... This angered the colonists. They felt the Proclamation was a plot to keep them under the strict control of England and that the British only wanted them east of the mountains so they could keep an eye on them.

You might be interested in

Jelaskan faktor yang mendorong berlakunya aktiviti perdagangan kerajaan Alam melayu

QveST [7]

Artikel ini menganalisis perkembangan ekonomi liberal dalam kegiatan perdagangan bebas di Negeri-Negeri Melayu Bersekutu (NNMB) sebelum Perang Dunia Pertama. Pendekatan neomerkantilisme digunakan untuk meneliti peranan kerajaan yang bersifat ‘protective’dalam memusatkan pentadbiran dan penggubalan dasar berkaitan pembangunan perdagangan antarabangsa. Galakan terhadap eksport perdagangan, pembentukaan sistem tarif dan tumpuan pengumpulan surplus merupakan analisis penting neomerkantilisme dalam mengukur sumber kekayaan negara. Perubahan reformasi tarif yang berlaku di Britain secara tidak langsung mempengaruhi perubahan dasar ekonomi di Pejabat Tanah Jajahan menjelang awal abad ke-20. Kerajaan Britain menggunakan ‘imperial preference’sebagai langkah untuk melindungi kepentingan perdagangannya di tanah jajahan. Dasar ekonomi yang bersifat liberal amat diperlukan oleh Britain bagi mengatasi masalah perdagangan bebas yang menerima persaingan yang hebat daripada blok neomerkantilisme, khususnya Amerika Syarikat dan Jerman pada awal abad ke-20

6 0

3 years ago

What argument did women use to win the right to vote ?

anygoal [31]

Back then, the amendment stated that All. Us Citizen were the subject to taxes, and The US Citizen have the rights to vote

So the women argue that since they were not represented, they shouldn't have to pay taxes .

7 0

3 years ago

What if Vietnam war never started?

notka56 [123]

If the war never happened many unnecessary deaths could've been avoided. Also the public would've probably had more support for the president.

4 0

2 years ago

Does any president deserve credit for an economic boom or recession? Who is more important in influencing the economy-the presid

stepan [7]

Every year, the Federal Reserve conducts a massive survey of American households to paint a portrait of their economic habits and spirits. The recently published findings for 2017 are worth examining for what they say about who should — and shouldn't — get credit for the resilient U.S. economy.

There is nothing unusual about this. When the economy does well, presidents of both parties routinely brag about the results. Trump did just that last week with the latest jobs report. But as I — and many other commentators — have written, the $20 trillion economy is simply too big and complicated to be easily manipulated for partisan advantage.

4 0

2 years ago

1. A man goes to New York and tries to pay with a Pennsylvania dollar, but the cashier does not take it. There needs to be a ___

masya89 [10]

Because the man tries to pay with a Pennsylvania dollar in New york and get rejected, there needs to be a uniform currency for all states.

<h3>What is a uniform currency?</h3>

A uniform currency refers to an exact currency being acceptable and spent in the region been circulated in.

Hence, because the man tries to pay with a Pennsylvania dollar in New york and get rejected, there needs to be a <u>uniform currency</u> for all states.