Answer:
If the span of management is wide, <u>Fewer</u> levels are needed, and the organization is <u>Flat</u>. If the span of management is narrow, <u>More</u> levels are needed, and the resulting organization is <u>Tall</u>.
Explanation:
Span of control is the number of personals working under a single Designation.
If their are greater number of employees working under a single designation then the hierarchy chart is wider in length, that's the reason we also say that the organization is flat. Due to these increased number of employees working under single designation, there is lower number of levels in such organization. It is also one of the main reason the employees turnover is very high because there are fewer chances of promotion in flat organizations. The number of candidates for the promotion are higher in the organization.
On the other hand, if their are lower number of employees working under a single designation then the hierarchy chart is taller in length, that's the reason we also say that the organization is flat. Due to these lower number of employees working under single designation, there is higher number of levels required in such organizations. It is also one of the main reason the employees turnover is very low because there are higher chances of promotion in tall organizations. The number of candidates for the promotion are fewer in the organization.
<span>Companies especially ones with multinational operations and/or newly acquired businesses, typically have multiple cultures rather than a single culture.
When a business is multinational, they operate in different countries and in each country they operate in they are dealing with different cultures. Because of this, they have different cultures within their organization and operate according to where they are doing business. Successful companies will adapt to each culture so that the business runs like any other business would in their country.
</span>
Capital gains, supply and demand, taxes, and locations (sometimes)
Answer:
B. Check for positions in your area
Explanation:
i think though!! im not sure
Answer:
c.$176,720
Explanation:
Calculation for The NPV for this project
NPV=-450,000+200,000 / (1.16)^1+225,000 / (1.16)^2+275,000 / (1.16)^3+200,000 / (1.16)^4
NPV=-450,000+172,414+167,212+176,181+110,458
NPV=176,720
Therefore The NPV for this project is closest to :176,720
