Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer:D. the serial position effect
Explanation:Serial-position effect refers to how we tend to easily remember only the first and last items in our list of items and find it hard to recall those in the middle of our list
Remember those at the first list is known as a recency effect and recalling those at the end of the list is known as primacy effect
It would go straight up and so you could get there faster
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Below are the answers:
1. <span>Her ability to write and speak helped get the movement's message heard by the public
</span>
2. <span>women’s rights movement
</span>
3. <span>government </span>
