a) true
Stress has mostly been perceived as a negative emotion and one that should be avoided in the interest of good mental and physiological health. But the pioneering work of renowned psychologist Dr. Richard Lazarus has proven this perception to be flawed.
Dr. Lazarus argued for a distinction between eustress, which refers to positive stress, and distress, which implies negative stress.
Eustress occurs in the presence of positive stressors such as acing an exam and getting a promotion. Eustress causes one to feel motivated and improves performance. Distress is caused by negative situations like death of a love one or illnesses, and causes anxiety and depression.
To learn more about stress: brainly.com/question/13137015
#SPJ4
Answer:
Power of public opinion commonly called <em>socially correct decision</em>
Explanation:
All over the world, there has been series of views and opinion that has been coming up. This views tends not to conform to the socially accepted views that was hold few decades ago. This views could be in the political sector, in the business sectors or in the social sector with a common example being allowing same-sex people from dating and marrying each other which was not obtainable 50 years ago.
For Ludmilla to publicly agree is as a result of the power of public opinion that are socially correct eventhough her personal views runs contary to it. She does not want to be on the opposing end of those politically correct group of people who felt their views are the right thing to do.
Answer:
c) language
Explanation:
Language is the process through which we communicate and which shapes our reality, it is our spoken, written, or signed words and the ways we combine them to communicate meaning. Our thought process is controlled by our language and our thought process determines our perception and reality, thus language shapes our reality.
The right answer is naturalistic fallacy
The naturalistic attempt defines any attempts to define good
in generalizable way which has the tendency to render statements meaningless.
It entails defining good in terms of what ought to be and results in explaining
good reductively as is the case in the statement.