Answer: THIS IS NOT PLAGIARISM, because the student has acknowledged the source of it's knowledge in it's literature work, making it more easier for anyone to consult it's source and read further for a deeper knowledge.
Explanation: plagiarism is the use of ones literature work to build your own literature work without acknowledging the person's work. In it's simplest term, It is the theft of knowledge. When you have acknowledged the source of your knowledge, it won't be called plagiarism, because we have the right to the literature work, to guild us on a topic.
I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not attach options, we can say the following,
The three quotations that support the purpose of this document are the following.
1.- It was the first and formal text that including official data of the state of Minnesota.
2.- The book included facts and information about cities, landscapes, people, population, and business in the state.
3.- The text was aimed to inform and attract businessmen, investors, tourists, and even immigrants. It was such an encyclopedia to promote Minnesota. Like an almanac.
The author of this document titled "Minnesota as it is in 1870," was John W. McClung, and he not only included major cities but almost all small towns and locations to promote their activities.
I think it they would get paid by tax, im not 100% sure. Hope this helped :)
I think is found near the Philippines.
