Answer:
A) Violence would be necessary to achieve civil rights goals.
Explanation:
Malcolm X was a famous civil rights leader during the 1960's. In terms of inciting change, his style was much different than the nonviolent methods used by people such as Martin Luther King Jr. Instead, Malcolm X advocated for self defense and violence if necessary. Malcom X argued that if whites were going to use violence against black citizens, than these black citizens should have the right and responsibility to fight back to protect themselves.
What contributions did<span> Francisco Pizarro </span>make<span> to later </span>Spanish exploration and conquest<span>? He kidnapped the Inca emperor, which led to the empire's downfall. What impact </span>did<span> later </span>Spanish exploration and conquest<span> have on the people of Europe?</span>Spain<span> rapidly expanded foreign trade and overseas colonization</span>
Strikes can create positive conditions in that: They bring attention to the bad conditions workers faced.
<h3>What are Strikes?</h3>
Strikes also known as industrial action is a situation where worker protest about a certain thing either the working conditions or the workers warfare by not going to work. When workers strike, everybody stays at home. In some circumstances, they barricade or close down the road or gates of the industry.
Strikes help the authorities to focus their attention to the bad working conditions in which workers operate. So option C is correct.
Learn more about Strikes here:
brainly.com/question/5171285
Answer: Sale and export of slaves to Louisiana.
Explanation: European explorers influenced the development of Louisiana starting with the massive importation of slaves to work in sugar cane plantations, which was very low, sufficient reasons for the purchase of more slaves to explorers, thus achieving in this way that production will increase and lead to the economic development of this territory.
Answer: Straw man.
Explanation:
A straw man refers to a form of argument of refuting an argument, Eben though the argument's real subject was not addressed but rather the argument was replaced with a false one.
In this case, another person's argument is being taken by someone else. Then, the person either exaggerates it or distorts and then attacks the distortion without arguing on the main claim.
The statement that "My opponent would have you believe that lung cancer can be cured simply by posting "No Smoking" signs on anything
that stands still" is straw man. Here, the main argument regarding lung cancer isn't addressed.
