the question is not so clear
is it (x+3)/3 or what you have written is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The conclusion "T" logically follows from the premises given and the argument is valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us use notations to represent the steps
P: I take a bus
Q: I take the subway
R: I will be late for my appointment
S: I take a taxi
T: I will be broke
The given statement in symbolic form can be written as,
(P V Q) → R
S → (¬R ∧ T)
(¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S
¬R
___________________
∴ T
PROOF:
1. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S Premise
2. S → (¬R ∧ T) Premise
3. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → (¬R ∧ T) (1), (2), Chain Rule
4. ¬(P ∨ Q) → (¬R ∧ T) (3), DeMorgan's law
5. (P ∨ Q) → R Premise
6. ¬R Premise
7. ¬(P ∨ Q) (5), (6), Modus Tollen's rule
8. ¬R ∧ T (4), (7), Modus Ponen's rule
9. T (8), Rule of Conjunction
Therefore the conclusion "T" logically follows from the given premises and the argument is valid.
Answer:
84
Step-by-step explanation:
Given,
Length of the print(l) = 24 inches
Width of the print(b) = 18 inches
Perimeter of the print(P)= ?
We know,
Perimeter of the print(P) = 2(l + b)
= 2(24 + 18)
= 2(42)
=84 inches^2
Step-by-step answer:
Given:
Initial monthly salary = $5000
New salary = 10% less
Salary a year after = 15% more
Solution:
New salary
= 5000 * (100-10)%
= 5000 * 90%
= 5000 * 90/100
= 4500
Salary a year after
= 4500 * (100+15%)
= 4500 * 115%
= 4500 * 115/100
= 45*115
= 5175
It’s either A or B mate I’m really not sure
