1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Komok [63]
3 years ago
7

Compare and contrast the ideologies of conservatism, liberalism, and nationalism.

History
2 answers:
Yuki888 [10]3 years ago
8 0

The most direct contrast is between conservatism and liberalism.  Let's start there.

In the 19th century, "conservative" and "liberal" were first coming into vogue as terms for political viewpoints. What "conservative" and "liberal" meant then was different from what those terms mean in politics today. 19th century conservatives wanted to conserve and preserve the historic traditions of government and society. For societies like France and elsewhere on the continent of Europe, that meant going back to monarchs in control of government, as things had been before the French Revolution. Liberals were those who favored liberty for individuals, with greater rights and freedoms. So the various answers that spoke of voting rights, elected parliaments, and democratic change -- those all were measures favored by liberals in the 19th century, not conservatives.

Nationalism was a 19th century movement that had the ability to attach itself to either conservative or liberal agendas.  In France, feelings of national unity rallied the people to the cause of the French Republic as a liberal form of government.  In Russia, on the other hand, nationalistic pride went hand-in-hand with staunchly conservative and autocratic forms of government.   In the German states, liberals were the ones who first pushed to form a united German nation.  However, it was a more conservative approach under Otto von Bismarck of Prussia that actually accomplished the unification of Germany.  So nationalism can be associated with either liberal or conservative causes -- or both.

Anton [14]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Conservatism is belief in the rights of the individual and STRICT interpretation of the constitution.  </span>

<span>Liberalism believes that the greater good is more important than individual rights. that the constitution is an outdated document and needs to be changed to fit the changing times. 
</span>conservatives - capitalism separates the worthy from the unworthy; if you're poor you deserve to be poor because it must have been from a mistake you made or a character flaw 

<span>liberals - capitalism is a good but imperfect system; sometimes people need help to get out of poverty and it's fair to ask the very rich to kick in a bit for that purpose</span>
You might be interested in
•Please answer this, need it ASAP•
grigory [225]

Answer:

B) Ivory

Explanation:

England wanted multiple natural resources, but considering the competition, it had to focus on the most important ones. The gold was of great economic value, so it was on top of the list. The coal was still the main source of energy for the industry, so it was also on the desirable list. The rubber was becoming more and more popular because of its properties, practicality, and cheapness, so it too was on the wish list. The ivory though lost its importance. In the past it was very important, but the times have changed and numerous other things have become much more useful and valuable, so it was not a priority.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the economy develop under the guidance of Alexander Hamilton?
zubka84 [21]
Hamilton tried to improve government finances and strengthen the nation at the same time. Hamilton’s economic plan
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Santiago receives an allowance of $7 every week.How much total does he receive after 4 weeks?
velikii [3]
Basic problem!
So every week he receives $7. This is then added to his total every week. So in 4 weeks, this means he has added 7+7+7+7, also known as 7x4. This results in an answer of $28 after 4 weeks!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the only people who could vote in the colonies?
Dima020 [189]

In some places, propertied women, free blacks, and Native Americans could vote. But I think it's D. because I know they could for sure....

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List one negative impact of the Panama Canal to Indigenous peoples of Panama.
pogonyaev
One negative impact would be people or citizens of the Panama would dislike that Indigenous people can come over into the Panama and the trading would extend until free trade without quotas or tariffs.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • which was a condition that existed in rome around 100 BC that contributed to the eventually downfall to the republic? A. a widen
    5·2 answers
  • Following world war ll a metaphoric “iron curtain” was drawn across Europe what was meant by this
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP! will vote brainliest!
    8·2 answers
  • What was the eisenhower doctrine
    5·2 answers
  • summarize the opinion of scientists at Oak Ridge and the University of Chicago about the use of nuclear weapons.
    9·1 answer
  • For what specifically was the Syrian Congress asking? Do you think the European powers expected this response to the League of N
    8·1 answer
  • ¿en que se diferenciaban la monarquía constitucional y absoluta?
    9·1 answer
  • Please define the following terms:
    10·1 answer
  • Following the tragic events of the Holocaust, to what organization did this man turn to make genocide a crime under internationa
    14·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Judiciary Act of 1789?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!