1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WARRIOR [948]
3 years ago
6

What factors led to the convention replacing the caucus as a widely used nominating method?

History
2 answers:
ivanzaharov [21]3 years ago
3 0
Different groups within political parties may have different goals isn the presidential nominating process. but of course, all parties are surely interested in winning the election, but depending on one whether one is a leader, or maybe even an activist,this goal may conflict with other purposes of the political parties.
avanturin [10]3 years ago
3 0

I believe the answer is: we want our voters to educate themselves without outside opinions conflicting with our own beliefs that affect our voting choices

In a caucus, the representatives of each party for the presidential election is appointed by the voters, not the party. This make a lot of them appoint only someone that they know directly (such as friends and relatives) . Due to the complication of this method, the process changed into convention, where the right to choose the representatives for presidential candidates belong to the party.

You might be interested in
What was the effect of plessy v. ferguson in the united statess?
FrozenT [24]
It caused the separate but equal. Everything the whites had the blacks had too. If the whites got a school then the blacks did too. If the whites had a dining area the blacks did too. I really don't mean to sound racist. I just don't know how else to explain it. 
3 0
3 years ago
Why are two Houses of Congress a good places to discuss issues that might require new laws
Anettt [7]
House of representatives and senate because they are the legislature and the legislature make the laws
3 0
3 years ago
What was the name of the person who took control of Rome during times of immediate danger when a chief executive was needed?
finlep [7]

Answer:

A consul held the highest elected political office of the Roman Republic (509 to 27 BC), and .... During times of war, the primary qualification for consul was military skill and ... to the 3rd century, the people were still called on to ratify the Senate's selections. .... The consuls also served as the chief diplomat of the Roman state.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The evidence in this passage could best be described as empirical evidence showing that sugar prices were plummeting all over th
vekshin1

Answer: B) Logical evidence showing that sugar farming was changing because of laws and low prices.

Explanation:

Took the test on edgenuity

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
100 points! PLEASE HELP! Don't answer if you don't know.
kifflom [539]
Answer is it encouraged the growing of cash crops
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WHAT STATEMENT IS TRUE
    13·1 answer
  • Identify a word that means opposite of secede
    10·1 answer
  • How long is a representative's term of office?
    14·2 answers
  • What statement best describes the Catholic Church during the Renaissance?
    11·1 answer
  • Which outcome was MOST LIKELY to occur after the passage of this part of the act?
    15·2 answers
  • Restrictions under the magna carta
    9·1 answer
  • What was a major cause of the War of 1812
    5·1 answer
  • 3. Who created the Open Door Notes?
    13·2 answers
  • Match the labels to each location on the map
    15·1 answer
  • Which World War II activity is being promoted in this poster?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!