You didn't put the choices but I'm sure the answer wouls either be, Discriptive or Reflective Essay.
This argument illustrates the slippery slope fallacy as Leo Panchello was used to create a happy picture of how much hard work local business owners put in and then goes on to tell how the light rail would destroy the local business and ruin all of their hard work which brings a sad ending.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
This is known as a mistaken belief, a faulty or failed reasoning especially one based on unsound argument.
Hence, the fallacy makes the argument weak because there's no indication that a light rail would destroy a main local business in the town as when constructing a light rail, they do not tear up the street, instead, they make the light rail a part of the street
A slippery slope fallacy is a course of action that is rejected because there is little or no evidence that one insists to lead to a chain reaction resulting in an undesirable end.
Read more about<em> fallacy </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1971023
#SPJ1
The quotation from Christine Guth does a lot by manner of
making points. One thing the quotation
from Christine Guth does is support MacGregor’s point about The Great
Wave. It does this with the use of a
clever interpretation. Through
interpretation, the wave can be seen as a manner in which travel as well as
trade can take place. Too, Japan can be
isolated by this wave according to the interpretation.
