Answer:
■Gene sequences would be used to make Probes for both the Southern and Northern blots.
■The probes will be used to view the presence of each gene with the use of isolated genomic DNA obtained from the isolated bacterium
■Each probes hybridized to the genome shows the pathway is isolated and point of the genes were involved in the substrate catabolism
■The carbon source in the isolate is derived from the substrate inducing the catabolic pathway as RNA determine transcripts present
■Probes hybridizing to the same sequences would be used to determine the gene activity for the pathway as seen in the southern one
■since all the genes present in the genome couldn't be identified, the northern would be important to work on
■Catabolic pathway is determined by the same genes. Hence, the need for gene/transcript probes to hybridize to the transcriptome.
The property rights approach to environmental issues often becomes highly relevant in cases involving endangered species.
The approach based on property rights postulates that if exclusive property rights are correctly established, the public good of maintaining high environmental quality may be converted into a private good, and the best possible distribution of environmental resources will be accomplished.
The protection of people's property rights is an efficient method for preserving and rehabilitating endangered animals. It is more likely that recovery will occur if these animals are owned by someone who will benefit in some way from their growth. But if endangered species are nothing more than a burden, any kind of financial incentive to preserve them is met with fierce opposition.
Learn more about endangered species here :
brainly.com/question/10415903
#SPJ4
Answer:
A statement can contain one argument, more than one argument or no argument.
Argument are intended to determine the degree of truth hence enabling a conclusion to be made. It contains one or more premises and only one conclusion.
A premise is the statement in the argument that provides reasons to support a conclusion.
In the first statement, there is no argument. This is because there is neither a premise nor a conclusion
The second statement has a conclusion(the last sentence) and two premises(first two sentences) therefore it is an argument.
Answer:
Hey there
1 It will make it loud for them; negitive
2 It will disturb the wildlife and natural processes; negitive
3 It will remove plants in order to insert the road and animals will get hit by cars going on the road; negitive
4 More roads more cars more driving more pollution; negitive
5 It will make it easier for logging companies because they can hall more wood; negitive
6 Sense there is a new road it will be easier for tourist to come; negitive
Baboons, sparrows, and human beings are considered both primary and higher order consumers because they all eat plants and meat.
Primary consumers feed on producers/ plants. Then secondary consumers feed on primary consumers.
