Answer: D) Technological lockout.
Explanation: Technological lockout occurs when a new dominant design prevents a company from competitively selling its products.
In this scenario, people switched to the other food delivery applications. Hence, preventing Sewsavor from competitively selling its products as it used to.
Answer:
he is still getting paid while he is out. He probably has a doctors note.
Explanation:
idk what the question is.
Answer:
Preston has to make four phone calls to clients today. The call to Mr. Miller will take about an hour to complete, the call to Ms. Winnecuit will take about five minutes to complete, the call to Mr. Drudge will take about thirty minutes and the call to Mrs. Freich will take about fifteen minutes to complete. If all the calls are equally important, who should Preston call first?
From the analogy above, in order to maximize the time frame. The call to lesser clients should be prioritized before others, this means that Preston should place a call to Ms Winnecuit which will last for five minutes follow by Mrs Freich which will last for fifteen minutes follow by Mr Drudge which will last for thirty minutes and lastly to Mr Miller which will last for about an hour.
Prioritization comes in play to time frame of each call, the lesser minutes calls will not take too much time to be completed while the call with highest time frame comes last as a result of the time involved.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. 13.1%
Explanation:
Return on assets is a financial measure that gives insight to the amount of income earned for $1 of the company's investments in asset. It is given as the ratio of net income to average total asset.
Given;
Beginning total asset = $4,520
Ending total asset =$4,180
Average total asset = ($4,520 +$4,180)/2
= $4,350
Net Income = $570
Return on asset = $570/$4350
= 13.1%
Option c. 13.1%
Answer:
D) win, because locke had apparent authority to bind the partnership.
Explanation:
Apparent authority refers to an an agent (in this case Locke) that has the power to act on behalf of a principal (the partnership), even though that power has not been expressly granted. The principal's conduct must imply that it has granted that power to the agent in order for a third party to reasonably believe it.
In this case Locke is a partner, so he is part owner of the partnership, that is why Gage reasonably believed that he had the power to place the order. Usually if the agent (Locke) had apparent authority, the principal (the partnership) will be liable for his actions.
