Claims that drop-out rate has increased because more women have taken jobs in the workplace is an example of false cause fallacy.
A false cause fallacy is said to occur in a statement because the link between the premises and conclusion does not even exist.
Here, phrase one is "high school drop-out rate has increased" and phrase two is <em>"because </em><em>more women </em><em>have </em><em>taken jobs </em><em>in the workplace"</em>
<em />
If we assess the two phrase, we will observe that their is no link between the statement to facilitate a valid conclusion because when woman taking jobs in workplaces can not result to increase in drop rate in high school.
Therefore, it is an example of false cause fallacy.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/6987057</em>
which system tax collection system supports the idea that some states are more valuable than others is the Articles of Confederation says that its value will be estimated based on land, people, and improvements
Taxes can be defined as mandatory levies from the people for the state. Every penny of tax money paid by the people will be included in the post of state income from the tax sector. Its use is to finance central and local government spending for the welfare of the community.
Taxes are very beneficial for the state. In full, taxes are widely used for:
- Financing state expenditures, such as: self-liquidating expenditures, for example: expenditures for productive projects for export goods.
- Financing reproductive expenditures, such as: expenditures that provide economic benefits for the community, for example: expenditures for irrigation and agriculture.
- Financing expenses that are not self-liquidating and non-reproductive, for example: expenses for the construction of monuments and recreational objects.
- Financing unproductive expenses, for example: expenditures to finance national defense or war and expenditures for future savings, namely expenditures for orphans.
You can learn more about tax here brainly.com/question/16423331
#SPJ4
Answer:
The efficient outcome would be greater than 150 units.
Based on the scenario, one risk to this effort is cannibalization. Cannibalization in business is being
defined as a situation in which the new product that are released will likely
take the demand and sales of another existing product or the competition of
this new product that will result the overall sales to be reduced even if the
new product sales are increasing.
Answer:
The effect on the sale of PV1 would be $3,000 and on PV2 it is $1,500
Explanation:
For computing the effect on the ordinary income, we have to do the following adjustment which is shown below:
PV1 = Sale price-adjusted basis
= $8,000 - $5,000
= $3,000
The $3,000 represent the short term capital gain, and it is a short term capital gain because the equipment is sold in less than 1 year
PV2 = Sale price-adjusted basis
= $16,000 - $18,000
= - $2,000
The $ -2,000 represents the long term capital loss , and it is a long term capital loss because the equipment is sold in more than 1 year
So, the effect on the sale of PV1 would be $3,000 and on PV2 it is $1,500 because the deduction is allowed to a maximum of $1,500
