Answer: -21
Step-by-step explanation:
whatever
Answer:
6: Reason 2 - substitution, Statement 4 - PR congruent to PR, Reason 4 - reflexive property, Reason 5 - AAS
8: Rotation
Step-by-step explanation:
6: Since both of the given angles equal 90°, you can <em>substitute</em> Angle RPT in to make Angle PRQ congruent to Angle RPT. Then, since both triangles share Line PR, <em>PR would be congruent to PR</em> by the <em>reflexive property</em>. And since you know that Angle Q is congruent to Angle T, you can see that Triangle QRP is congruent to Triangle TPR by the <em>AAS theorem</em>.
8: Since the 1st triangle is pointing to the right and the 2nd triangle is pointing downward, this would be a rotation of 90° clockwise (or 90° counterclockwise if the 1st triangle is the one pointing downward)
I don't have 7, sorry.
Also (if you haven't noticed it already), there's a typo in the 1st statement of the proof. Just thought I'd let you know ;)
Answer:A ( Both the domain and range of the transformed function are the same as those of the parent fuction
Step-by-step explanation: yes.
divide them:
52.50 / 7 = 7.50 dollars per hour
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : Function 
To find : The first partial derivatives of the function fx(x, y) and fy(x, y) ?
Solution :
Function
Partial derivative w.r.t to x means y treat as constant,
Partial derivative w.r.t to y means x treat as constant,
(Derivative of constant is zero)
