<span>Spain in the 1500s, when they traded with the Native Americans some play toys....</span>
I think it was its set up
The correct answer is B) New York Times v. United States. It meant that prior restraint could be used only to prevent the release of information that would directly imperil the country's war effort.
The nuremberg laws were anti-Jew laws, so if you were Jewish, you either would have to change your religion, or you would be punsished. It would not really affect you if you are not jewish.
It's B, i<span>t caused high civilian casualties but did not result in surrender.</span>
