Answer:
The right answer is option (D).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the most appropriate answer is option (D) because systematic study can be defined as the study of social relationships and behavior and making a decision on the basis of data collected.
While the other options are not that appropriate because of the following reasons:
- The organizational study can be defined as the study when a person organizes a process which results in boosting the social relation.
- Intuitive study shows the concept of making decision immediately without going deep on data collected.
- Theoretical study shows the concept of study anything very theoretic and than makes the decision.
- Case-based study shows the concept of study which checks though the results of similar cases to make any decision.
Answer: Account manager
Explanation: The account manager is that salesman of a company who is responsible for managing sales and relationship with particular customers of the company. The account manager is assigned accounts of customers of which he has to maintain relationships with.
The main focus of account manager is to manage sales with customers and identify new business opportunities if any.
Thus, Account manager is the right answer for the given case.
Answer: The options are given below:
A. $18.00
B. $1,036.80
C. $2.00
D. $7.20
E. $64.00
The correct option is D. $7.20
Explanation:
From the question above, we were given:
Annual demand = 100,000 units
Production = 4 hour cycle
d = 400 per day (250 days per year)
p = 4000 units per day
H = $40 per unit per year
Q = 200
We will be using the EPQ or Q formula to calculate the cost setup, thus:
Q = √(2Ds/H) . √(p/(p-d)
200=√(2x400x250s/40 . √(4000/(4000-400)
200=√5,000s . √1.11
By squaring both sides, we have:
40,000=5,550s
s=40,000/5,550
s=7.20
Setting the pay according to the goals achieved
by a group may not be considered beneficial to everyone, thus decreasing motivation.
Pay-for-performance or according to individual performance may help motivate
the employee but increasing individuality in terms of performance may also decrease
group cohesiveness or group-related values. The speaker here shows depreciation by undervaluing another's work to overvalue or protect one's own.
