Answer:
B. It is a common form of economic thinking
Explanation:
Thinking at the margin is a pattern of thinking where the thinker thinks forward with regard to the coming hour, the coming day, or coming income, while letting the past to go and considering what is presently best for the the thinker or in the coming times.
Thinking at the margin involves thinking ahead, and in economics principle, thinking at the margin is required for making rational decisions
An example of thinking at the margin is deciding to by more pasta for the month than required when there is a scarcity of a brand of pasta and the inflation, which may both be due to the introduction of better brand of pasta by the manufacturer causing a delay, and a temporary inflation respectively
Therefore, thinking at the margin is a common form of economic thinking
Answer:
It is an Evasion Plan of Action.
Explanation:
An Evasion Plan of Action also known as EPA is a plan widely used by the armed forces or any other institution that establishes direct combat missions.
This plan allows evasion strategies to be established promoting the institution to have a successful recovery, given its status within the conflict. All this through the collection of precious information about the conflict that allows the combat team to increase their strategies and establish a predictability of what may happen during the conflict.
Sociologists refer to the conscious experience of a negative discrepancy between legitimate expectations and present actualities as Relative Deprivation.
Relative Deprivation
Relative deprivation is officially defined as an actual or perceived lack of resources needed to maintain a standard of living (such as a diet, activities, or material possessions) to which different socioeconomic groups or individuals within those groups have grown accustomed, or are thought to be the accepted norm within the group.
Many people experience relative deprivation, a subjective unhappiness. Comparisons between one person's present situation and that of another lead to this unhappiness. People who experience relative social deprivation believe they should obtain the same things as others. When they miss things, they don't feel equal because of the pressure society places on them. These comparisons are relative since they are being made against non-absolute standards.
Learn more about the Relative Deprivation: https://brainly.in/question/28788440
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because opportunity cost is the loss of potential gain from other choices when one choice is chosen.
I believe the answer is: <span>both sets of participants experienced elevated stress levels
High testosterone individuals tend to filled with desire to 'dominate' other, which often make them feel stressful in low-status situation when they couldn't show their dominance.
Low-testosterine individuals tend to be at ease in peaceful and orderly situation. so they tend to feel stressful in high-status situation when they're surrounded by threat of competitions.</span>
