This type of committee might be called a <u>reviewing committee</u>.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Reviewing means assessing or examining someone’s work by focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of the work.
Reviewer is a person who reviews the work of others in motive to have betterment and ensure the some standard.
Researchers usually get their work to be reviewed before publication. This helps them to makes any changes if required.
To protect the rights and welfare of all research participants Professor Wheeler agreed to be the member of reviewing committee at his university.
Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
The answer is "variable-ratio schedule".
In operant conditioning, a variable-ratio plan refers to a calendar of fortification where a reaction is strengthened after an eccentric number of reactions. This timetable makes an enduring, high rate of reacting. Betting and lottery diversions are great cases of a reward in view of a variable ratio schedule.
Answer:
Imma take these points owo
Explanation:
