The essay initially pretends to be a critique of a type of self-improvement book popular at the time, which claimed to tell how to achieve success. These books defined success strictly in financial terms and assumed that if anyone follows certain steps, they will be able to duplicate the accomplishments of wealthy business owners. However, Chesterton’s review of these books includes a broader social criticism. The focus on the definition of success strictly in terms of money is central to his essay. But wrapped around that issue is the idea that each person can or should perceive success on the same terms as a business leader. He illustrates the point by saying a donkey is successful at being a donkey as much as a millionaire is successful at being a millionaire, so there is no point in calling a donkey a failed millionaire or vice versa.
To counter the common assumptions about success, Chesterton describes people in various walks of life and how each might more realistically succeed. In this description, he suggests that these books falsely pretend to help people succeed in their own social circles and encourage people to try to become something they are not and cannot ever be.
Chesterton says these writers tell the ordinary man how he may succeed in his career—if he is a builder, he may succeed as a builder; or if he is a stockbroker, he may succeed as a stockbroker. Chesterton increases his satire at this point, commenting that the authors say a grocer may become a sporting yachtsman; a tenth-rate journalist may become a peer, which is a British nobleman; and a German Jew may become an Anglo-Saxon. Obviously, these transitions are unlikely or even impossible. Chesterton then criticizes the main assumption of these books and the society that produces it. By claiming that average people can follow in the steps of business tycoons such as Rothschild or Vanderbilt, the book's author is taking part in "the horrible mysticism of money," in which people worship the unlikely possibility of achieving great riches.
Answer:
Primarily, it is done to build suspense. The author hold back information to keep the reader interested and looks forward to the rest of the unravel. Moreover, conflict is the heart of piquing a readers interest and if all was given away in the start, there would not have been much left.
However, this can not be the only case. Otherwise, the plot may resonate a pretentious aura. The author tries to look through the eyes of the characters and lets them gain information as if it were reality, being able to relate with the actual reader. Giving you, the reader, and the characters something in common; confusion.
Answer:
Based on the given excerpt above taken from the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, this relates to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education in a way that the case of Brown talks about whether the system of education that is separated by race would limit the privileges of the citizens.
Hope this helps.
Explanation:
C. To present the topic and point of view of the book.
A is done within the book, B is done at the back of the book, and D is usually the author's note.
Answer: B: earths magnetic field protects it from all types of space weather
Explanation: There is no text provided but this is the one that seems like it would be a good summary compared to the other answers.
B would be your best option because it explains the text more.
