<h3>Answer: Median</h3>
Explanation:
The median is the center divider in highways. The median separates traffic that travels in opposite directions to prevent collisions. The median could be a concrete barrier or it could be unpaved grass, or perhaps a combination of both. Other median types are possible as well. Metal guardrails may be present on either side of the median.
Side note: The word median comes from the Latin medius which translates to middle or central.
This answer would be true
Answer:
50 minutes.
Explanation:
2018 NHTSA key findings:
■ In 2018 there were 10,511 fatalities in motor vehicle traffic crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher. This totaled 29 percent of all traffic fatalities for the year. (Note: It is illegal in every State to
drive with a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher.)
■ An average of 1 alcohol-impaired-driving fatality occurred every 50 minutes in 2018.
■ The estimated economic cost of all alcohol-impaired crashes (involving alcoholimpaired drivers or alcohol-impaired nonoccupants) in the United States in 2010 (the most recent year for which cost data is available) was $44 billion.
■ Of the 2018 traffic fatalities among children 14 and younger, 22 percent occurred in alcohol-impaired-driving crashes.
■ The 21- to 24-year-old age group had the highest percentage (27%) of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes compared to other age groups in 2018.
■ The percentage of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes in 2018 was highest for motorcycle riders (25%), compared to drivers of passenger cars (21%), light trucks (19%), and large trucks (3%).
■ The rate of alcohol impairment among drivers involved in fatal crashes in 2018 was 3.4 times higher at night than during the day.
■ In 2018 among the 10,511 alcohol-impaired driving fatalities, 67 percent (7,051) were in crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .15 g/dL or higher.
Source: NHTSA 2018 data
Hope that helps
Answer:
The statement that is true about criminal law is It involves wrongs against society.
Explanation:
Lets use process of elimination!
The first sentence states It provides the injured party with a remedy.
This would be personal injury case, not a criminal case.
The second sentence states It involves wrongs against individuals.
This would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.
The third sentence states It tries to return the injured party to the same position before injury.
This again would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.
Which leaves the fourth and final sentence. It states It involves wrongs against society.
This is the correct answer because if you did something to an individual, it would be a civil matter, but the wrongs against society would be like commiting a homicide, robery, grand theft, assult, arson, kidnapping, etc.
Hopefully this helps!!
Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!
