Answer:
there is no advantage
Explanation:
other then the fact that they were there when the crime was commited
Answer: The legitimate answer would be to prevent crimes.
Explanation: But in the United States of America, laws are created by politicians may choose ideology.
The question of whether it would be ethical for Agnozzi's experience at the store warrants a law suit is:
- Based on the fact that Agnozzi did not have any clear indication that he was deaf, the store employee was well within his rights to give chase because he did not heed to the warnings.
<h3>Ethics in a law suit</h3>
This refers to the moral grounds which a person has to challenge an experience or a situation which he or someone else was involved in that he believed was unfair and wants to contest it in a law court.
With this in mind, Agnozzi can file a law suit but he would unlikely get a favorable ruling from a judge based on the situation of things as they occurred.
Read more about ethical law suits here:
brainly.com/question/19569605
Answer:
Batterer Intervention Programs Abuse can also result in victims who were not previously considered low-income falling into poverty: violence often undermines victims' ability to work, have a place to live, and do what is necessary to pursue a more stable life for themselves and their children.
Explanation:
sorry if this does not answer you question T-T
