Answer:
The answer is a. low self-efficacy.
Explanation:
According to Bandura, self-efficacy explains how well a person thinks he can perform a task.
Self-efficacy is linked to social cognitive theory, which implies that our behaviours and reactions are a result of social observation and interactions. This means that a person with low self-efficay is likely to see a challenge as something that can't be overcomed.
The functionalist perspective argues that ethnic
differentiation may be dysfunctional because it reduces consensus and increases
the chances of conflict.
<span>The </span>functionalist<span> perspective, also called </span>functionalism, is one of the
major theoretical perspectives in sociology. It has its origins in the works of
Emile Durkheim, who was especially interested in how social order is possible
or how society remains relatively stable.
Answer:
The Full Form Of WHO Is WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION
<u>Full question:</u>
People scoring high on the ________ dimension of the Big Five model are more likely to be socially dominant, "take charge" people than those who score low.
A) agreeableness
B) conscientiousness
C) openness
D) extraversion
E) emotional stability
<u>Answer:</u>
People scoring high on the extraversion dimension of the Big Five model are more likely to be socially dominant, "take charge" people than those who score low.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Extraverts lead to be more satisfied in their careers and their lives as a mass. They encounter added positive passions and they more easily formulate these attitudes. They also perform to achieve better in responsibilities that need vital interpersonal cooperation.
Ultimately, extraversion is a comparatively powerful predictor of administration evolution in organizations; extraverts are more humanly authoritative, "take charge" kinds of characters, and they are commonly more aggressive than introverts. One downside of extraversion is that extraverts are more unpredictable than introverts
<u>Answer</u>: The <u>Legalists </u>philosophers believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws.
The Legalism is the third intellectual current that flourished in China before the unification by the Qin Dynasty. The three centuries before the unification were so rich in terms of political thought that is known as “The Golden Age of Chinese Philosophy” with “The Hundred Schools” of thoughts. Other famous schools in this period are Confucianism and Taoism.
The long period of war were times of great chaos and disorder. Profound changes happened during these three centuries – economical, military and social changes. A new administrative approach needed to arise and the Legalists were at the forefront of this innovation.
Legalism is the most practical current of that period. Legalists would not focus on philosophical speculations, such as the evolution of the human nature, morality or divine will. Instead, they focus on how to achieve the goal of unification. Nothing, not even the past, could distract them of this goal. Because of that, they defended that the past doesn’t teach a thing and doesn’t shape the present or the future, but a radical change in the present is the only way to restructure the society. This change could only happen by “the rule of the law”, where individual morality of the ruled and the rulers are not taken into consideration. They believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws. Applying those is the radical change that would create a powerful government, able to coerce its subjects and install a rich state and a powerful army. In that scenario, the state has the ultimate authority and such power is given to it by means of military strength.
