Answer:
Tamara's example is in fact an example that represents a linear functional relationship.
- This is because the cost of baby-sitting is linearly related to the amount of hours the nany spend with the child: the more hours the nany spends with the child, the higher the cost of baby-sitting, and this relation is constant: for every extra hour the cost increases at a constant rate of $6.5.
- If we want to represent the total cost of baby-sitting in a graph, taking the variable "y" as the total cost of baby-sitting and the variable "x" as the amount of hours the nany remains with the baby, y=5+6.5x (see the graph attached).
- The relation is linear because the cost increases proportionally with the amount of hours ($6.5 per hour).
- See table attached, were you can see the increses in total cost of baby sitting (y) when the amount of hours (x) increases.
Answer:
<h2>IT'S 22 JUST FOUND OUT </h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
31.5 units²
Step-by-step explanation:
Area = ½*base*height
Height of the triangle on the grid = 9 units
Base = 7 units
Area = ½*9*7
Area = ½*63
Area = 63/2
Area = 31.5 units²
Graph the parabola using the direction, vertex, focus, and axis of symmetry.
Vertex: (1/2,484)
Focus: (1/2, 30975/64)
Axis of Symmetry: x=1/2
Directrix: y=30977/64
x l y
1/2 l 484
1 I 480
A) How long did it take for Jason to reach his maximum height? -b/2a=-16/-32= 1/2s
B) What was the highest point that Jason reached?
484ft ~h(ois)
C) Jason hit the water after how many seconds?
roots -5&6 so 6s
Oh and by the way there is some seriously cool cliff jumps in Acapulco, I'm dying to go.
<u>1/2s, 484ft, 6s</u>