Answer:2/16
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:1.206 is what i got
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
See ecplanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
False.
On the Data analysis tool from excel we can conduct the following procedures:
Anova: Single Factor
Anova: Two factor with replication
Anova: Two factor without replication
Correlation
Covariance
Descriptive statistics
Exponential smoothing
F-test Two sample for Variances
Fourier analysis
Histogram
Moving Average
Random number generation
Rank and percentile
Regression
Sampling
t test: Paired two sample for means
t tes: Two sample assuming equal variances
t test: Two sample Assuming Unequal Variances
z test: Two sample for means
And as we can see we don't have an specific procedure just to obtain confidence interval for the difference of proportions. We need to remember that if we select a z test in excel, for example the output will contain the confidence associated to the parameter, but for this case is not too easy obtain a confidence interval for the difference of proportion like on a statistical software as (Minitab, R, SAS, etc) since all of these statistical softwares are elaborated in order to conduct all the possible statistical tests and confidence intervals for parameters of interest.
Answer:
3.6 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
The total distance was 6 mi. and the total time was 5/3 hr.
6 ÷ 5/3 = 6(3/5) = 18/5 = 3.6 mph
Answer:
The statement is false.
Step-by-step explanation:
To begin an indirect proof, you assume the converse of what you intend to prove is true. This is false.
Rather the correct answer is that to begin an indirect proof, you assume the inverse of what you intend to prove is true.
The converse can be either true or false, depending on what the original statement is, so assuming the converse is pointless.
