Okay My three Consumers I’m going to use are-
•Herbivores
•Carnivores
•Decomposers
Explanation~
For herbivores there living things that eat only plants to get energy so an example of that could be Whales,Elephants, Cows etc
Carnivores are meat eaters soo those would be animals like owls,Tigers,Sharks etc
Decomposers break down dead plant and animal material and examples of those would be Earthworms and Mushrooms
HOPE THIS HELPED!!
Answer:
Explanation:
The normal form of the prion protein PrP (shown here) is found on the surface of nerve cells, but when it changes into its misfolded form, it aggregates into long fibrils that clog up the normal functioning of the brain.
<span>After ovulation, an oocyte, or egg cell, remains viable in the female body for up to 24 hours. The generally accepted lifespan in a woman's body is 12 to 24 hours for the egg and up to five days for the sperm cells. Intercourse occurring as many as five days prior to ovulation, therefore, could potentially result in pregnancy.</span>
Answer:
The environmental factor that could lead to a decrease in genetic variation in a tuna population is an increase in pollution (second option).
Explanation:
There is a correlation between genetic variability and environmental pollution, the latter being a factor that impacts negatively on the variability of a specific population.
The concept of pollution stress not only implies a low rate of reproduction, but it is also a factor that prevents genetic exchange with other populations, which is a factor that makes the genetic variability decrease in a population.
For these reasons an increase in pollution implies a decrease in genetic variability in a tuna population.
- <em>Other options, such as </em><u><em>an increase in food availability</em></u><em>, a</em><u><em> decrease in tuna fishing
</em></u><em> or </em><u><em>a decrease in tuna predators</em></u><em>, are environmental factors that contribute to increased genetic variability.</em>
Griffith's experiment worked with two types of pneumococcal bacteria (a rough type and a smooth type) and identified that a "transforming principle" could transform them from one type to another.
At first, bacteriologists suspected the transforming factor was a protein. The "transforming principle" could be precipitated with alcohol, which showed that it was not a carbohydrate. But Avery and McCarty observed that proteases (enzymes that degrade proteins) did not destroy the transforming principle. Neither did lipases (enzymes that digest lipids). Later they found that the transforming substance was made of nucleic acids but ribonuclease (which digests RNA) did not inactivate the substance. By this method, they were able to obtain small amounts of highly purified transforming principle, which they could then analyze through other tests to determine its identity, which corresponded to DNA.
