Answer:
(A)Fv= $864.2
(B) Fv= $1302.05
(C) Fv= $2003.4
(D) Fv= $96817.21
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Initial investment= $550
We will use the final value formula:
FV=Present value*(1+i)^n
(A) 9% compounded annually for 5 years.
Fv= 550*(1.09)^5=$864.2
(B) 9% compounded semiannually for 5 years.
Fv= 550*(1.09)^10= $1302.05
(C) 9% compounded quarterly for 5 years.
Fv= 550*(1.09)^15= $2003.4
(D) 9% compounded monthly for 5 years.
Fv= 550*(1.09)^60=$96817.21
Answer:
Explanation below.
Explanation:
The recommendation that I will give or propose is that the agreement must have a legal backing.
This is the best recommendation that a wise person can proposes. It is a show of height of stupidity when an individual go into conjunction with another person without any written agreement that is backed legally. This because, when there is a problem in the future, the documents will be a way to solve it.
The other secondary option is written and signed agreement with video recording. This is not as good as the one mentioned above, but can still be considered as an alternative.
Answer:
The answer is option A) Diversification merits strong consideration whenever a single-business Is faced with diminishing market opportunities and stagnating sales in its principal business company
Explanation:
Diversification is a technique that reduces risk by allocating investments among various financial instruments, industries, and other categories. It aims to maximize returns by investing in different areas that would each react differently to the same event.
It's important to diversify among different asset classes. Different assets such as bonds and stocks will not react in the same way to adverse events. A combination of asset classes will reduce your portfolio's sensitivity to market swings. Generally, bond and equity markets move in opposite directions, so if your portfolio is diversified across both areas, unpleasant movements in one will be offset by positive results in another.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In autocratic leadership, the leader or manager does not allow the team members to contribute to the group's decisions. It is also known as authoritarian leadership. The leader issues command-like instructions that must be followed by everyone.
In general, workers do not like authoritarian leaders. Authoritarian leaders do not consider workers' opinions, nor do they value their inputs in decision making. Discouraging group inputs stifles creativity and innovation. Workers are always demoralized as they do not feel part of the team and its decisions.
