One problem that really bothers me is racial inequality, mainly in terms of employment.
Professional obstacles and challenges for blacks remain. First, still in college, for access to higher education, finding internships focused on the area of academic education in different segments. Then, with the course completed, enter the job market.
It is necessary to promote racial inclusion. There is no magic formula for this, but above all, interest, participation and the use of means that make the admission of black professionals great opportunities for growth and improvement of the institutions are necessary. This is because thinking about inclusion implies changes in behavior, structures and strategies in order to qualify incoming black professionals.
So in that case, it will be really good to have programs to help black people.
Answer:
I’m pretty positive that it’s B. But if it’s not then it’s D.
Answer:
D-He lived for some time after the Boston Massacre and spoke to his doctor about what he saw.
Explanation:
On the night of the shooting, he heard the sound of the bell on the street and decided to go outside. He knew that the trouble had something to do with the British – his neighbor persuaded him to leave behind a small cutlass before he headed to King Street. When the shooting erupted, he was wounded while crossing the street with his friend.
For Carr, shot through his abdomen, death was inevitable. He was carried to his master’s house and was tended by Doctor Jeffries. It took him four days to die, but he refused to lay the blame for his agonizing death upon the soldiers. According to the Doctor’s testimony during the trial, Carr told him that he thought that the soldiers would have fired long before. Were the soldiers greatly abused? Yes, they were. Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Yes. So they fired in self-defense? Yes, and he did not blame whoever hit him.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
It seems that ypur question is incomplete.
However, trying to help you we can say the following.
In this sentence: "the people in attendance cheered when their team scored the winning goal." Is this an action or act or the state of the mass reaction of mass conduct?
We can say it is a combination of both. It is an action because most people that are considered "fans" of that team, have feelings for the team, like the sport, and cheer when the team scores and wins. They feel good when the team wins because they respect what the team represents.
On the other hand, we can say that it could be the reaction to mass conduct because if people are in a stadium -for instance- they react and follow instinctively what the other people say and do. That is why people in the bleachers scream, shout, cheer, and behave in strange ways they normally do not do.
