<span>Cons
</span>Depression of wages may occur but this seems to be temporary.
Having workers willing to work for relatively low pay may allow employers to ignore productivity, training and innovation.
Migrants may be exploited.
Increases in population can put pressure on public services.
Unemployment may rise if there are unrestricted numbers of incomers.
There may be integration difficulties and friction with local people.<span>Positive
</span>Job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled.
Economic growth can be sustained.
Services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally.
<span>The pension gap can be filled by the contributions of new young workers and they also pay taxes.
</span><span>Pros
</span>Job vacancies and skills gaps can be filled.
Economic growth can be sustained.
Services to an ageing population can be maintained when there are insufficient young people locally.
The pension gap can be filled by the contributions of new young workers and they also pay taxes.
Immigrants bring energy and innovation.
<span>Host countries are enriched by cultural diversity.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
1. a highly developed society
2. a group of people with same interest
4. interpreting data
3. all knowledge
5. the study of humans
6. document produced the same time as the event
7. document produced after the event
Explanation:
not 100% sure this is right but here
OPEC was protesting because the U.S. was supporting the Israeli military leader during the Yom Kippur War.
<span>Enlightened absolutism is a system in which rulers tried to govern by Enlightenment principles while maintaining complete royal power. These Enlightenment principles include have equality, the freedom of speech, religion, press, and to own property. I do not think a truly enlightened absolutism style government can exist because, if the rulers follow the ideas of Enlightenment, they can still lose their power.</span>
The correct answer is D. When unemployed, the government will make payments for that. The more unemployed there are and the longer they are without work, it will mean more spending for the government.
