The Anti-Federalists had more influence on the Bill of Rights, as they were the ones who wanted it in the first place. The Federalists thought a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while the Anti-Federalists pushed for it.
The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The federal government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, and numerous other important matters. The Anti-Federalists agreed with this, as they associated having a strong government with British tyranny. They thought that if the government was powerful, they may abuse the citizens. The Federalists on the other hand wanted a stronger government. They believed that having a strong government meant having a strong country, and they thought the Articles of Confederation was doing more harm than good. When the Constitutional Convention of 1787 occurred, the Articles of Confederation was only meant to be changed. It ended up getting thrown out all together and the United States Constitution was created instead. The Anti-Federalists disagreed with this and demanded to have a Bill of Rights, which would protect the citizen's rights. The Federalists thought this wasn't needed, as the states had the powers that the federal government did not. The Anti-Federalists insisted though and believed it was important that they had a proper document protecting their rights.
The Anti-Federalists had more influence while creating the Bill of Rights because they were the ones who pushed for it in the first place. They thought having a document to protect the rights of the citizens was needed, while the Federalists thought it was essentially useless as the states already had all of the powers that the federal government did not hold.
Answer:
your best options are C or D bud
Explanation:
slaves were never given much just enough to live off of and if that weren't the case then ty escaped from their captors if one of the answers said that there was a ship wreck then you'd be golden but these are your best options
hope i helped and if i did leave a thanks and a rating plz!!
Answer:
1. What might be the costs of having such a large national debt?
When a country has a very large debt like the U.S., people may think that the country will not be able to pay off the debt. It's the same situation as a person who has a lot of debt, even more debt in a year than income in a year: people will believe that he or she will probably not be able to pay off the debt.
When this happens, people will invest less in the economy, the debt will become more expensive because the interest rate will be higher, and this in turn could lead Congress to enact policies such as tax hikes or debt renegotiations, which are always negative for an economy.
2. Did the promise that tax cuts would result in a growing economy that would pay for any budget shortfalls come true during the Reagan years?
Reagan's tax cuts did not lead to increases in tax revenue. On the contrary, tax revenue, as predicted by many, actually fell. This, in addition to increased military and social security spending, led to large budget deficits during the Reagan administration.
Answer: Native Americans, Agents of trading companies, and Trappers
Explanation:
The Fourteenth Amendment<span> (proposed in 1866 and ratified in 1868) provides a broad definition of national citizenship, overturning the </span>Dred Scott<span> case, which excluded African Americans. It requires the states to provide equal protection under the law to all persons (not only to citizens) within their jurisdictions.</span>
The Thirteenth Amendment (proposed and ratified in
The Fifteenth Amendment (ratified in 1870) grants voting rights regardless of "race, color, or previous condition of servitude".
1865) abolished slavery.
