PLEASE HELP I WILL MARK BRAINLEST!!!!! Franco is making a fruit salad. The ratio of cups of strawberries to cups of bananas is 2
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
0.75
Step-by-step explanation:
The table is not well presented (See Attachment)
There are at least two approaches to this question
Method 1:
Steps
1. Calculate the mean of reported heights
Mean of reported heights = (61+68+57.5+48.5+75+65+80+68+69+63)/10
Mean of reported heights = 655/10
Mean of reported heights = 65.5
2. Calculate the mean of measured heights
Mean of measured heights = (62 + 68 + 56.5 + 47 + 72 + 65 + 78 + 67 + 69.5 + 62.5)/10
Mean of measured heights = 647.5/10
Mean of measured heights = 64.75
3. Get their difference
Difference = Mean of reported heights - Mean of measured heights
Difference = 65.5 - 64.75
Difference = 0,75
Method 2: Calculate the mean of their difference
Mean of difference = Sum of difference / Number of observations
Mean of difference = (-1 + 0 + 1 + 1.5 + 3 + 0 + 2 + 1 – 0.5 + 0.5)/10
Mean of difference = 7.5/10
Mean of difference = 0.75
Note that in both cases, the result is 0,75.
Hence, the reported heights at the school is 0.75 greater than the actual measured height
We have to find the values of F.
In this case. F is unlikely to be a polynomial.
But the problem is, we can’t calculate the values of F directly.
There is no real value of x for which x = x−1 x because F isn’t defined at 0 or 1. so,
substituting x = 2.
F(2) + F(1/2) = 3.
Substitute, x = 1/2
F(1/2) + F(−1) = −1/2.
We still are not getting the required value,
therefore,
Substitute x = −1
As, F(2) +F(−1) = 0.
now we have three equations in three unknowns, which we can solve.
It turns out that:
F(2) = 3/4
F(3) = 17/12
F(4) = 47/24
and
F(5) = 99/40
Setting
g(x) = 1 − 1/x
and using
2 → 1/2
to denote
g(2) = 1/2
we see that :
x → 1 - 1/x → 1/(1-x) →x
so that:
g(g(g(x))) = x.
Therefore, whatever x 6= 0, 1 we start with, we will always get three equations in the three “unknowns” F(x), F(g(x)) and F(g(g(x))).
Now solve these equations to get a formula for F(x)
As,
h(x) = (1+x)/(1−x)
which satisfies h(h(h(h(x)))) = x
Now, mapping x to h(x) corresponds to rotating the circle by ninety degrees.
In this case. F is unlikely to be a polynomial.
But the problem is, we can’t calculate the values of F directly.
There is no real value of x for which x = x−1 x because F isn’t defined at 0 or 1. so,
substituting x = 2.
F(2) + F(1/2) = 3.
Substitute, x = 1/2
F(1/2) + F(−1) = −1/2.
We still are not getting the required value,
therefore,
Substitute x = −1
As, F(2) +F(−1) = 0.
now we have three equations in three unknowns, which we can solve.
It turns out that:
F(2) = 3/4
F(3) = 17/12
F(4) = 47/24
and
F(5) = 99/40
Setting
g(x) = 1 − 1/x
and using
2 → 1/2
to denote
g(2) = 1/2
we see that :
x → 1 - 1/x → 1/(1-x) →x
so that:
g(g(g(x))) = x.
Therefore, whatever x 6= 0, 1 we start with, we will always get three equations in the three “unknowns” F(x), F(g(x)) and F(g(g(x))).
Now solve these equations to get a formula for F(x)
As,
h(x) = (1+x)/(1−x)
which satisfies h(h(h(h(x)))) = x
Now, mapping x to h(x) corresponds to rotating the circle by ninety degrees.