Answer:
For a good analysis of the painting and to answer precisely what is asked, you should consider this:
1 - to analyze the movement, just explain the technique used by the artist. How it looks to the eye, is the movement fluid? How the brush was used to create this movement, and how the brush strokes are used on the canvas?
2 - in the case of physical analysis, you should consider if the artist had achieved the proposal to follow the movement correctly. In other words, if the artist was correct to portray this element. Another thing you should put into consideration is the strength he used in the brush strokes in order to achieve the illusion of movement.
3 - Finally, you have to explain how these elements contributed to creating the illusion of movement, and how our senses perceive this point. Just explain what you could see, based on your experience and feelings looking at the canvas.
Explanation:
The neoclassical paintings were calm and simple which is the answer. Neoclassical painting involves on the austere linear design in any classical event, character as well as the theme using the correct setting as well as costumes.Hope this would be of help.
The smile in Kooning's Woman I painting is a reference to Renaissance art, specifically the Monalisa's smile which can be interpreted as either smirking or disgust.
<h3>Who was Willem de Kooning?</h3>
Willem de Kooning (1904 - 1997) was a Dutch American nationalized painter, an exponent in the years after World War II of abstract expressionism and gestural painting.
One of his best-known works is the Woman series. In the case of the first work of this series, the author refers to Renaissance art because the expression of the woman's lips refers to Monalisa's lips, which do not have a clear expression and allow interpretation by those who contemplate her.
Learn more about painting in: brainly.com/question/25795412
I think he stole something. I'm not sure.
