Answer:
General Motors had more of a Production Orientation
Explanation:
The company which is production oriented focuses on the production and company's production processes and runs campaigns to sell the product produced or the product they are producing. General motors produced the products which it is good in producing the products and won the market against great giants like Ford, Toyota and German auto companies. Whereas Toyota was developing market which is newly born and started pricing their products on the basis of products that were desired (environmentally friendly products) and lost the market because of lost of market share as this market was in introduction phase and Toyota left a market which was at maturity. Then it is obvious that Toyota has revenue losses due to leaving its concentration and marketing of products to mature market and was busy in developing environmentally free products market in US.
Macroeconomics is important because it allows the public to understand the economy as a whole, fiscal policy and global economic policy.
Republican Governor Hiram Johnson was the California governor who was instrumental in changing the executive bureaucracy from a spoils system to a merit system.
A spoils system refers to a system of patronage in which the victorious candidate or party in an election gives public offices to their supporters as reward and incentive.
It was a common phenomenon in the United States, until a civil service reform movement led to passage of the Pendleton Act of 1883, which instituted merit-based appointments to offices at the federal level.
Hiram Johnson was a former Governor of California between 1917 to 1945. He was credited with many progressive reforms, among which was ensuring the executive bureaucracy operated on the basis of merit and not political patronage.
To learn more about Hiram Johnson: brainly.com/question/8407551
#SPJ4
