Answer:
The answer is significantly.
Explanation:
Oligopoly is a market situation in which there are few sellers, selling similar goods and services and many buyers. The barriers to entry in this market in high. Example of a oligopoly market is OPEC.
The competition amongst the few sellers is high because they are selling the same thing and a change in price by one firm will significantly affect other firms in the industry. For example, if a firm reduces the price of its goods, this creates a price war and other firms to start reducing their price to match the lower price. And if another firm increases its price, consumers will switch to competitors
Answer:
For whom to produce.
Explanation:
This fundamental question tends to answer the sector of the customers the company will produce for. It reflects the customer's buying power and willingness.
- For example, If the customer we are producing has enough money, so we should go for first come first served basis, OR, If the customer lacks money and it hinders the customer to watch a movie so we motivate them to participate in a lottery so are in guise targeting that section as well.
There are different aspect to being a broker. To whom do the listings belong is Carter as the principal broker.
<h3>Who is principal broker?
</h3>
- Note that in real estate office, there has to be a principal or designated broker. This is known to be an individual who is responsible for managing or the person who oversees all licensed real estate agents at a specific firm.
He or she makes sure that agents are working in compliance with state and national real estate law. Based on the scenario between Carter and Kathleen and Holly, the listings belong is Carter as the principal broker.
Learn more about a broker from
brainly.com/question/6304438
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
