Answer:
a.common stock.
Explanation:
The additional $10,000 of owners equity after listing on the stock market will be named as common stock. After listing company issues shares for capital investment in it. Common stock is the appropriate term used for every addition in the owners equity. So the correct option is a.common stock.
Answer:
d) Installment sales contract
Explanation:
A contract is described as an agreement between two or more parties commits to undertakes specific obligations. In a sale contract, the buyer and seller agree to the exchange or foods or services for a consideration called price.
An installment sale contract is an agreement that allows the buyer to make payment for the goods or services over time. Once an agreement has bee reached, the buyer takes possession of products and is free to use them. The buyer makes regular payments for the goods (installments) and will claim ownership upon completing payments. An installment sale contract is a form of credit sale.
Answer:
$17 gives 100 utils
So, $1 gives 100/17 utils
which implies that $20 gives (100/17)*20 = 117.65
So additional utils = $117.65 - $100 = $17.65
Hence, $17.65 is the additional utils
Explanation:
Answer:
Retailer
Explanation:
When a producer directly sells the goods to customers, who directly consume the goods rather than further sale, then the producer or seller is termed as retailer.
Goods on retail simply means sales for direct consumption.
Here, Phoenix Farms produces fresh food products which are directly consumables and are sold directly rather than involving intermediaries thus, he is a <u>retailer</u>.
Answer:
The answer is: D) Fire the player. The team may suffer financially at first, but if the public has faith in the organization, the team and the league will benefit in the long run. If the owner keeps the tape a secret and the public finds out about his actions, the team - and society - will suffer harm from the loss of public trust.
Explanation:
Akers firmly believed that ethics were fundamental to economic competitiveness. He argued that without ethical behavior, individuals, corporations and society as a whole couldn´t be economically competitive.
So in this case, he would have simply terminated the player´s contract without regarding any of the potential downsides for the team.