Question

Tommie, a six-year-old child, was seriously injured when he stuck a fork into an electrical outlet at a restaurant. His parents sued the restaurant where the incident occurred, claiming it should have had child protective guards on the outlets even though no law required the restaurant to do so. Whether the restaurant is liable will be dependent upon whether:__________
A. the court views Tommie as a licensee or a trespassing child.
B. this is negligence per se.
C. this is an ultrahazardous activity.
D. the incident was reasonably foreseeable.

Answer 1

the incident was reasonably foreseeable.