I am answering this from experience. If you stop a car and you know that the person driving has a felony first of all a felon is not allowed to carry a weapon or have one in his or or presents at all times if they are cought with one they go to jail. Secondly if I pull over someone and they have a history of Violence with a deadly weapon or in general I will call for backup. You never go head on in a situation when you don't know if the suspect has a weapon inside of the car or on them. When backup arrives you start commanding the driver to step out of the car. If the driver does not come out of the car we walk up slowly but we make sure we have backup first. Never just walk up to a car with a driver who has a felony of assault with a deadly weapon because you have no idea what to expect. I hope that this has answered your question
Answer:
B. make sure your car is adjusted correctly and ready for a drive
Explanation:
A pre-drive check can ensure your vehicle is in good shape and will not cause any problems when you are on the road.
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
